Fraud and Misrepresentation
Allegations involving false statements, omissions, inconsistent applications, document problems, unauthorized work, or disputed intent.
Peter Messersmith represents individuals, families, professionals, entrepreneurs, and businesses in U.S. immigration matters, with particular attention to complex inadmissibility findings, visa denials, entry refusals, prior removal, and immigration waivers.
Peter Messersmith has practiced U.S. immigration law since 2002. His work has involved immigration petitions, applications, waivers, visa matters, admission problems, government findings, and cases requiring detailed legal and factual analysis.
INA §212 cases often begin with a government conclusion: a visa refusal, an inadmissibility finding, a cancelled visa, a refused entry, a prior removal order, or a notice alleging that the applicant is not eligible to enter or remain in the United States.
Effective representation requires more than identifying a waiver form. The attorney must determine exactly what the government found, whether the finding is legally and factually supportable, which agency controls the next step, and whether the better strategy is a waiver, challenge, correction, reconsideration, new application, or another remedy.
The firm handles only U.S. immigration matters and represents clients located throughout the United States and internationally.
The firm evaluates inadmissibility and related immigration problems arising during visa processing, admission, adjustment of status, consular processing, and later government review.
Allegations involving false statements, omissions, inconsistent applications, document problems, unauthorized work, or disputed intent.
Nonimmigrant and immigrant visa refusals involving INA §212, administrative processing, revocation, or unresolved government records.
Airport and border matters involving visa cancellation, withdrawal of admission, expedited removal, or refused entry.
Three-year, ten-year, and permanent-bar issues involving prior overstays, departures, unauthorized presence, or attempted reentry.
Immigration consequences arising from arrests, convictions, admissions, controlled-substance issues, and foreign criminal records.
Removal, deportation, exclusion, expedited removal, voluntary departure, and permission-to-reapply issues.
Waivers involving fraud, unlawful presence, criminal grounds, health issues, nonimmigrant admission, and other statutory grounds.
FOIA strategy, visa-record review, legal memoranda, agency inquiries, and evaluation of incomplete or unexplained government findings.
Presidential proclamations, nationality-based restrictions, sanctions-related issues, and other government travel limitations.
The legal strategy should follow from the record, not from assumptions about what an officer may have meant.
Determine the statutory provision, government agency, factual allegation, procedural history, and practical effect of the decision.
Compare applications, statements, notices, travel history, court records, supporting documents, and available government records.
Consider whether the finding should be challenged, corrected, clarified, waived, reconsidered, or addressed through a new filing or application.
Prepare the supporting evidence, legal analysis, declarations, government records, and procedural submission appropriate to the selected strategy.
Immigration inadmissibility can affect a person traveling temporarily, applying for permanent residence, joining family, accepting employment, operating a business, or pursuing an important professional opportunity.
Visa applicants, spouses, parents, children, permanent-residence applicants, and travelers.
Business owners, investors, executives, managers, and frequent international travelers.
Physicians, scientists, engineers, professors, technology professionals, and other specialists.
Companies, universities, nonprofit organizations, and other entities affected by an employee’s immigration problem.
Complex immigration matters require direct advice, realistic evaluation, careful preparation, and clear communication about risk.
The legal issue is evaluated in the context of the complete immigration history, government record, and client objective.
Clients should understand the strengths, weaknesses, procedural choices, evidence needs, and potential consequences before acting.
The work is directed toward the specific government finding or procedural obstacle rather than relying on a generic filing approach.
Legal arguments must be supported by credible evidence, accurate chronology, consistent statements, and properly organized records.
Clients receive instructions regarding necessary evidence, procedural developments, deadlines, and important strategic decisions.
No immigration result can be guaranteed. Clients should receive a realistic assessment of available options and the uncertainties involved.
The Messersmith Law Firm reports more than 2,000 approved immigration matters since Peter Messersmith began practicing immigration law in 2002. This history reflects the breadth of the firm’s immigration practice, but prior results do not guarantee or predict the outcome of another matter.
Every immigration case depends on its own facts, evidence, procedural history, applicable law, government records, credibility determinations, discretionary factors, and the agency or officer making the decision.
Peter Messersmith has practiced U.S. immigration law since 2002.
Yes. U.S. immigration law is primarily federal, and the firm represents eligible clients throughout the United States and internationally.
The Messersmith Law Firm focuses on U.S. immigration matters. Representation in a separate state-law, criminal, family-law, or other nonimmigration matter may require another attorney.
The appropriate strategy may include reviewing prior applications and notices, requesting government records, examining visa or entry history, contacting the responsible agency when appropriate, or preparing a legal analysis addressing the possible ground.
No. Some cases require a waiver, while others may involve an incorrect finding, a statutory exception, an incomplete government record, a factual dispute, a legal challenge, or a different immigration strategy.
No. A consultation allows the attorney to review and discuss the matter. Representation begins only after the firm agrees to accept the case and the required engagement agreement and payment conditions are completed.
A consultation can help identify the applicable inadmissibility issue, evaluate possible waivers or other remedies, and determine what records and evidence should be reviewed before the next immigration step.